![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE: Make sure you 'enable images' to see this e-bulletin properly. WHAT IS THIS? You are receiving this e-bulletin because you are subscribed to the CMU Daily. Unsubscribe information is given at the bottom of this e-bulletin. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A VERY LONG YOUTUBE/PRS FOR MUSIC REPORT AND COMMENTARY - YOU'LL BE WISHING THEY BLOCKED THIS The decision comes as YouTube and PRS renegotiate the former's licence from the latter, which is required if the video site wants to legally feature any songs written by songwriters and owned or administrated by publishers represented by the Society, which is most of them. PRS, it's claimed, is using the renegotiations to try to push up the royalty fees it receives from the video service. YouTube, though, aren't keen on that idea, and say that the collecting society is being unreasonable, and that is why they have decided to stop showing music videos in the UK. Confirming their somewhat radical video-pulling plan, YouTube said in a statement yesterday: "We value the creativity of musicians and songwriters and have worked hard with rightsholders to generate significant online revenue for them and to respect copyright. But PRS is now asking us to pay many, many times more for our license than before. The costs are simply prohibitive for us - under PRS's proposed terms we would lose significant amounts of money with every playback". PRS have hit back at both YouTube's decision to pull music videos from their website, and at the video service's comments. They say that they had no warning that the video pull was coming, and that the decision has come in the middle of ongoing negotiations between the two parties. With regards the allegations they are being unreasonable in their negotiations with the Google and YouTube, they argue that the sticking point is that web company want to pay less for their members' songs, not that they are demanding more. What is most unusual about this whole thing, other than the fact that YouTube's decision to pull all premium music videos with immediate affect is a pretty severe measure, is that the content is disappearing off the Google video site at the web company's whim, rather than because of any demands by PRS or the music publishers they represent. Normally it's the content owners not the web platforms that instigate content removal. Unless YouTube really believe that PRS's demands are so unreasonable that they will never reach a deal, or that any deal will be so cost-prohibitive that just keeping the service going while negotiations continue is too costly, then Google's decision is presumably designed to pressure the collecting society into agreeing to a more favourable deal (more favourable for YouTube, that is). I'm not sure whether that pressure is meant to come from the public or the rest of the music industry. Will PRS For Music be perceived as the aggressor by the man on the street in this dispute, and if so will the collecting society - which recently rebranded seemingly in a bid to boost its public profile - collapse at the negotiating table in a bid to avoid becoming the pariah figure of online music fans. Or do YouTube hope their move will persuade the music industry at large to pile on the pressure so that PRS accepts their licencing offer. If so, where will that pressure come from? Possibly the songwriters and publishers PRS represents. Perhaps YouTube believe that the actual creators and owners of the songs they feature consider a YouTube presence much more vital than bosses at the collecting society, and that this radical move will rally said song owners into demanding PRS chiefs take a less hardline position at the negotiating table. PRS, presumably, would argue that they are acting in the interest of the songwriters and publishers they represent by not giving in to YouTube's royalty demands. They might add that those in the songwriting/publishing community - for whom YouTube style royalties are arguably more important than any record sales a YouTube presence may lead to - would rather not be on YouTube at all than be underpaid for their work. If pressure won't come from the songwriters and publishers where else? Well, perhaps the record companies, who are, after all, co-owners of the music videos that are about to be pulled off YouTube UK (most music videos having at least four copyrights in them - soundtrack, video, music, lyrics - which will, normally, be owned or administrated by two companies, artist/label and songwriter/publisher). For many record companies (though not Warner, who are also in dispute over royalties), YouTube is both an important tool and an increasingly important revenue stream. How many official artist and label web pages are about to lose their video feeds because they stream their own content via YouTube on their own websites? And how much money will Sony, Universal and EMI lose if UK music fans are not able to access their videos via YouTube, most people's first port of call for music video content? Will bosses at those three majors, and the many indies who will also be affected, be on the phone to PRS today telling them to do whatever is needed to get their content back on YouTube? And if PRS won't listen, will execs at the Sony, Universal and EMI record companies start badgering their counterparts at the Sony, Universal and EMI music publishing companies who do, presumably, have quite a bit of influence over the publishing royalty society. Perhaps that is what YouTube are hoping for. Though if they are, they shouldn't underestimate the willingness of record and publishing companies owned by the same major music firms to have very different opinions when it comes to royalty issues. Whatever, it will be interesting to see just how many videos are blocked by YouTube today, and how long either side in this debate will let the pop promo blockade to continue. Neither side win really. There are many other video websites with music video content - some licensed, some not. If YouTube goes too long without any music videos, or with sizable gaps in its catalogue, web users may start to discover those other services, some of which actually offer a better user experience anyway. PRS may not care about that, though if the sites web users are heading to are illegal sites that pay no royalties to anyone, then they're probably bigger losers than Google from any mass YouTube exodus. Of course, coming less than three months after Warner Music pulled its content from YouTube after their royalty renegotiations faltered, the latest development also poses some questions about the future of licensed on-demand music services. There is some disagreement among record companies and music publishers as to just how important such services are in the overall digital equation. Some say YouTube alone is bringing in substantial new revenues to record companies to help compensate for the decline in record sales income. Others say YouTube benefits more than the content owners from carrying music videos - and that the existence of on-demand video services are, anyway, contributing to the decline in record sales in the first place. But if royalties from online music services are an important part of the revenue mix for the music companies of the future, which I think they are, and if music is one of the best ways for websites to attract and engage users, which I think it is, then both web firms and music companies need to find a system that works for both parties. And, in the meantime, need to find a way around what I suspect will become an regular problem: web firm runs out of start up capital and realises original ad revenue projections were rather ambitious just as music owners return to the negotiating table, of the opinion they were overly generous first time round to help web firm get off the ground, and now looking for pay back. PS: The good news is, of course, that our music video service, the CMU-Tube, is powered by good old MUZU (www.muzu.tv) and not YouTube, so none of this affects us. Go enjoy some vids on us - www.thecmuwebsite.com/tube. -------------------------------------------------- RIHANNA WILL TESTIFY, IF ASKED: RIHANNA/BROWN UPDATE Brown is also seemingly seeking a speedy resolution in order to get on with his life. Of course, in his case getting on with his life means not going to prison for four years. According to TMZ, he is trying to make a plea bargain with prosecutors to have his charges bumped down from felony charges to misdemeanours. His lawyers argue that Rihanna's alleged "aggressiveness" in the couple's altercation (some reports claim she struck first) take the case out of the felony category. However, others argue those photographs of Rihanna's injuries show proof of Brown's "superior strength", which would bump the charge right back up to a felony again. TMZ also report that Brown sent a text message to Rihanna's assistant following the attack apologising for what he had done and saying that he was getting help. That text would be admissible in court and could be "extremely damaging" to Brown's case as it would amount to an admission of guilt. Brown has not yet entered a plea. Meanwhile, Rihanna is apparently taking her mind off the events of recent weeks by recording new material. Producer Adonis Shropshire has told Hip Hollywood that he is working with her on the follow-up to her 2007 album 'Good Girl Gone Bad'. He said: "[We have not been doing lots] because she's really just easing back into it. Just a couple of ideas here and there over the last couple of weeks but it's all coming out really good. She's really going in kind of the same direction, just an evolution of what she is - a super pop diva. She's doing okay. I guess her refuge is her music, as it should be". back to top WINEHOUSE'S COACHELLA GIG CANNED You may remember Winehouse was previously declined a US visa to attend last year's Grammys, and though she was eventually granted one, it was not in time for her to make the show. Elsewhere in Amy news, it has been confirmed that she will perform in May as part of the celebrations for Island Records' fiftieth anniversary, taking place at Shepherd's Bush Empire (there's a website for that anniversary by the way - www.island50.com) -------------------------------------------------- LOTS OF DRUGS AT PHISH REUNION C-MURDER JAILED OVER HOUSE ARREST RULES AMP POSTPONED BECAUSE OF SOUND RELIEF As we may or may not have previously reported, the shortlist for this year's prize is as follows... The Presets - Apocalypso ROWNTREE ISSUES STATEMENT ABOUT FUTURE WITH BLUR In a statement issued to the forum on Blur's official website, Rowntree said: "I want to set the record straight following the bizarre and inaccurate piece in The Independent today. As anyone who follows the band will know, we all have interests outside Blur. I am currently at law school, about to sit the exams for the first part of my training as a solicitor. I am fitting my studies around our preparation for the shows in the summer. I have one more year of academic training to complete, but if we decide to do more as Blur, I will obviously continue to fit my studies around the band and not the other way round. Whatever else I do, first and foremost I am a musician". back to top-------------------------------------------------- SUGABABES SPLIT RUMOUR A source told the paper: "They haven't ruled out getting back together in a year but they're officially on an indefinite extended break". -------------------------------------------------- FORTUNE LESS CLEAR ON INXS DEPARTURE As previously reported, Canadian Fortune, who won the frontman role in the Aussie band via that 'Rock Star INXS' TV show, said in a recent interview that he was fired from the group during a conversation with his bandmates at an airport in Hong Kong. The band denied the claims, saying that they had planned to get back in touch with Fortune about future projects, even though the contract that he won on the TV show was only for one album and one tour. In a new interview with Sun Media in Canada, Fortune says: "That was sort of a misquote [on my part]. It was the proverbial handshake. Nobody really said, 'Thanks a lot, kid'. I thought we were going to see each other again. It was kind of like, 'Hey, hey, I'll catch up with you later'". So, make of that what you will. Fortune is, of course, trying to launch is solo career at the moment. Whether he'll get any more work with INXS after his recent comments remains to be seen - their rep recently suggested not. INXS, by the way, have just announced they have extended their publishing deal with Warner Chappell UK, who will represent most of the band's catalogue worldwide. GRAHAM COXON ANNOUNCES NEW SOLO ALBUM The album will be preceded by a limited edition single on etched vinyl, 'In The Morning', on 18 Apr, and then followed by a second single, 'Sorrow's Army', on 25 May. A solo tour is also being planned for later this year. Graham says: "The album is mainly an acoustic journey although there is, of course, some explosive electric guitar action. I wanted to show how exciting acoustic instruments can be, how dynamic and rich and heart-thumpingly raw they can sound at a time when acoustic music seems either too cute or too soppy. Obvious influences here are the amazing Martin Carthy, the late, great Davey Graham and the late, great John Martyn". -------------------------------------------------- NEW FUCKED UP SINGLE U2 DATES 30 Jun: Barcelona, Nou Camp -------------------------------------------------- ROLO TOMASSI ANNOUNCE TOUR & FREE LIVE EP There are no dates announced for the capital as yet, but the band say they will be announcing "a very special event in London" soon. As a little extra bonus, the band are giving away a free live EP to anyone who pre-orders tickets through their MySpace page - www.myspace.com/rolotomassi The tracklist for the EP is: Oh, Hello Ghost Here are those tour dates: 14 Apr: Leicester, The Musician -------------------------------------------------- CALVIN HARRIS DATES 25 Apr: Thekla, Bristol BEACH BREAK LIVE ANNOUNCE LINE UP -------------------------------------------------- CAMDEN CRAWL, Camden, London, 24-25 Apr: Echo & The Bunnyman, Idlewild, Kitty Daisy & Lewis, Mumford & Sons, The Von Bondies, The Whip and Wire added to Friday 24, and Billy Bragg, Golden Silvers, Ipso Facto, King Creosote, Little Boots and Toddla T added to Saturday 25. www.thecamdencrawl.com GLASTONBURY, nr Pilton, Somerset, 26-28 Jun: Oh, so Neil Young is headlining after all, despite him also being booked for the IOW Festival. He joins Blur and Bruce Springsteen as headliners of course. Fleet Foxes also confirmed. www.glastonburyfestivals.co.uk T IN THE PARK, Balado, Kinross-shire, 10-12 Jul: Nine Inch Nails and Janes Addiction confirmed, The View, Glasvegas and Pet Shop Boys to headline King Tut's Wah Wah Tent. www.tinthepark.com ROSKILDE FESTIVAL, nr Roskilde, Denmark, 2-5 Jul: Nine Inch Nails added to this one too. Join bill that includes Oasis, Coldplay, Slipknot, Madness, Amon Amarth, Cancer Bats, Darkane, Deichkind, Dungen, Get Well Soon, Katzenjammer, Klovner i Kamp, Satyricon, Skambankt, Yoga Fire, The Soft Pack, Down, Baddies, and Marnie Stern. www.roskilde-festival.dk ALBUM REVIEW: Soap & Skin - Lovetune For Vacuum (PIAS) Buy from iTunes SOMERSIDE BECOMES COLUMBIA'S GM Confirming the appointment, Music Week quote Columbia MD Mike Smith thus: "We worked together while Angie was at Red Ink, and obviously the fact that she was general manager of Epic previously is perfect. For me it is great to have somebody coming in who has been working on the management, and understands what they are faced with, and also somebody that has been working with Universal so we can learn from how they are doing things, good and bad". -------------------------------------------------- EDGE ANNOUNCE NEW LIVE INVESTMENT SCHEME Edge Investment Management Director Alasdair George told CMU: "The Edge Live Fund combines tax advantages for the investor with the opportunity to participate in the live events business. With much of the uncertainty over Enterprise Investment Schemes now removed [because Chancellor blokey Alastair Darling clarified some things, I think], we are optimistic about the growth prospects of this market and the uptake of the opportunity to invest in the Edge Live Protected EIS (No.3) Fund". -------------------------------------------------- MUSICTANK PUBLISH DIGITAL REPORT The debates, involving representatives from the music industry, internet service providers and mobile networks, digital music service providers and government, looked at recent, current and future developments in digital music, at what digital services engage consumers while offering decent rewards to content owners, at how those services relate to and impact on each other, and at how legit licensed music services can compete - or not - with free illegal music services, with or without stepped up anti-piracy measures. The new report will provide a summary of those panel discussions, and then state the case for more research into new digital music services and models, recommending more consumer testing and maybe even a government-set timeline to motivate more development investment and cross-industry collaboration in the digital music domain. Collaboration is key, of course, and the report recommends the Memorandum Of Understanding reached between the record companies and ISPs last year be continued and developed to ensure workable ways to combat illegal file sharing are found, and that compelling new digital music services are developed. That said, relations between the labels and net firms are still rather tense, and with the government's recent Digital Britain report a lot less severe than expected with regards the ISPs duty to combat online piracy, it remains to be seen if the partnership created by the MoU achieves much in either the short or long term. Announcing the new report, MusicTank Associate Director Sam Shemtob told CMU: "Music rights holders - the canaries in the mine of the creative industries - are now focused on working with ISPs to offer fans legitimate alternatives to file sharing. MusicTank believes that only by building on the dialogue fostered by the MoU process, encouraging increased collaboration and road-testing different models, will the foundations be laid for compelling alternatives to be built upon". MusicTank Chair Keith Harris added: "MusicTank has become an important instrument for facilitating discussion on the music business issues of the day. This report will help focus the arguments between the main stakeholders on the key subject of solutions to the file sharing dilemma". The report is available for free from this here link: CITY TYPES MORE CONSERVATIVE ON APPLE PREDICTIONS As previously reported, the health of Apple boss Steve Jobs has been causing investment types some concern, so important is he to the company's success in many investors' eyes. But it's the recession which is reportedly making some analysts in the US downgrade their expectations regarding Apple profits. Sales on the high street of the iPhone and other Apple devices continue to do well, but increasingly cautious city types, including analysts at JP Morgan and Thomas Weisel Partners, are being more conservative that normal regarding the potential of Apple stock in the coming year, presumably assuming that as the economic gloom bites consumers will stop being quite so gadget hungry. The result has been a 2.5% slip in the Apple share price. FRANK SKINNER TO PRESENT WEEKEND SHOW ON ABSOLUTE Skinner's new radio show will be produced by his management, Avalon, who also produced his long running BBC/ITV chat show. It will be the first independent production to air on the national rock station. Confirming his new recruit, Absolute COO Clive Dickens called the comedian a "seasoned professional and a fantastic communicator who will be hugely popular with our audience", adding: "He is bloody funny and tells great stories and that is what you should expect from his Saturday show. I can see the enthusiasm with which he has approached it - radio is a medium that Frank very much wants to conquer". On the choice of time slot, 8-10am, ie before Ross goes on air on their rivals, Dickens added: "I am very conscious that Jonathan does a great job on Radio 2 and I can understand why people might compare them but I see Frank and Jonathan doing two very different things". -------------------------------------------------- C4 BOSSES TAKE PAY CUT, SKY SAY THEY'RE RUBBISH ANYWAY Confirming his pay cut, Duncan told reporters: "Executives volunteering to reduce their own pay is very unusual but these are exceptional times. Both Kevin and I are strongly committed to the future success of Channel 4 and believe this step demonstrates that commitment in a practical and meaningful way. Both of us believe this is the responsible course of action, as we enter discussions with our suppliers about extracting greater value from our programme investment". That last point will mean Channel 4 will be looking to reduce the cost of its programmes, by persuading the production companies who make their shows, and the celebrities who front them, to charge lower fees. Duncan and Lygo's pay cut announcement followed the release of BSkyB's response to the previously reported Digital Britain report published by the government which considered, among other things, the future of the British TV industry amid rising competition and declining ad revenues. The future of Channel 4 was, of course, a big part of that review following the network's claims that it could not continue to provide its public service programming long term with just ad revenues as income - bosses there were angling for a cut of the TV licence fee, though that is an option not favoured by either the BBC nor Digital Britain report writer Lord Carter. The report proposes Channel 4 merge with a commercial rival, like Channel 5 or maybe even ITV, to become more profitable, or form an alliance with the commercial division of the Beeb, BBC Worldwide. C4 execs reportedly favour the latter proposal. But the Rupert Murdoch-dominated Sky say that Channel 4 wasted millions on pointless new ventures outside its core remit - including the whole Channel 4 digital radio debacle, a costly new venture now scrapped - and that it therefore brought much of it current woes on itself. They seem to be suggesting that the government and broadcasting industry should be less forgiving, and that the government should not be pushing for - nor twisting competition rules to allow - any merger between C4 and BBC Worldwide or another terrestrial broadcaster. They argue that, despite the slump in profits, Channel 4 is sitting on healthy cash reserves and could survive by slashing back its operations to its core activities, and then investing time and energy into developing new revenue streams other than advertising and state subsidy - possibly subscription-based services (though C4 did dabble with that before). They indicate Sky would be willing to form an alliance with Channel 4 to help them do just that, adding that they have suggested such an alliance previously but have been knocked back by C4 execs. Sky's agenda re C4, unsurprisingly, seems to be driven by the aim of stopping the state owned TV firm from merging with another commercial terrestrial broadcaster, something that would create a formidable competitor for Sky. If there are going to be any alliances with other broadcasting companies, they'd prefer Channel 4 to work with them. And, if C4's new ventures mean they rely less on advertising revenues, and therefore compete less with Sky for advertising income, all the better. Sky's response to Digital Britain is one of many responses from media, content and telecommunications companies expected to be submitted this week. The responses will be considered before Carter publishes a second final report later in the year. TOTAL ROCK WORLD ALBUM CHART 1. Bruce Springsteen - Working On A Dream (Sony/Columbia) SPEARS OFF-STAGE PUSSY REMARK HEARD BY AUDIENCE -------------------------------------------------- DOHERTY DIGS POSH |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUBSCRIPTIONS>> CMU Daily is a free daily e-bulletin for people working in the music industry and music media, delivered direct to your PC each morning. If you want to stop receiving this e-bulletin click the 'unsubscribe' button below and follow the instructions. If any of your colleagues want to receive the CMU Daily tell them to email their name, company, job title and email to [email protected]. If you would like to recieve the CMU Daily as a text email, send a blank email from the email address you are registered at to [email protected]. MEDIA PEOPLE>> If you are looking for an independent quote on anything to do with the music business, or you need someone to come on your TV or radio show and talk music business, then we can help. There's nothing we don't know about. Email requests to [email protected] or call 020 7099 9050. CMU is published by and (c) UnLimited Media - www.unlimitedmedia.co.uk Send news stories to [email protected]. If we don't respond directly, we do apologise, only we get sent hundreds of emails a day and don't have time to respond to every one of them. However we do check every email sent to the musicnews email address, and do pull out stories that we feel are relevant to our readers. Send CDs for review to CMU, UnLimited Media, 221-222 Shoreditch High Street, London, E1 6PJ. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||